| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Nothing to hide argument ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Nothing to hide argument
The nothing to hide argument states that government surveillance programs do not threaten privacy unless they uncover illegal activities, and that if they do uncover illegal activities, the person committing these activities does not have the right to keep them private. Hence, a person who favors this argument may state "I've got nothing to hide" and therefore does not express opposition to government surveillance.〔Mordini, p. (252 ).〕 An individual using this argument may say that a person should not have worries about government or surveillance if he/she has "nothing to hide."〔Solove, ''Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff Between Privacy and Security'', p. (1 ). "If you've got nothing to hide, you shouldn't worry about government surveillance."〕
The motto "If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear" has been used in the closed-circuit television program practiced in cities in the United Kingdom.〔
==Prevalence==
This argument is commonly used in discussions regarding privacy. Geoffrey Stone, a legal scholar, said that the use of the argument is "all-too-common".〔Solove, Daniel J. "(Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have 'Nothing to Hide' )." ''The Chronicle of Higher Education''. May 15, 2011. Retrieved on June 25, 2013. "The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. The data-security expert Bruce Schneier calls it the "most common retort against privacy advocates." The legal scholar Geoffrey Stone refers to it as an "all-too-common refrain." In its most compelling form, it is an argument that the privacy interest is generally minimal, thus making the contest with security concerns a foreordained victory for security."〕 Bruce Schneier, a data security expert and cryptographer, described it as the "most common retort against privacy advocates."〔 Colin J. Bennett, author of ''The Privacy Advocates'', said that an advocate of privacy often "has to constantly refute" the argument.〔Bennett, p. (97 ).〕 Bennett explained that most people "go through their daily lives believing that surveillance processes are not directed at them, but at the miscreants and wrongdoers" and that "the dominant orientation is that mechanisms of surveillance are directed at others" despite "evidence that the monitoring of individual behavior has become routine and everyday".〔Bennett, p. (97 )-(98 ).〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Nothing to hide argument」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|